CITADEL Governance, risk & compliance
Risk posture Snapshot 15 Jun 2026
CR
Filters

Enterprise risk & compliance · 4 frameworks · 6 business units

Know exactly where your risk lives.

CITADEL maps every risk, control and compliance obligation in one place, so residual exposure and control gaps read as a heat-map you can act on, not a spreadsheet you dread.

GRC at a glance

Is our exposure under control?

Eight vitals for the programme, each against its 12-month trend. Filter or click any mark below to focus the whole page.

01 · Risk posture

Where the risk concentrates, before and after controls

The shape of the register: the inherent-vs-residual heat map, how open risk has trended, which categories carry it, how controls move inherent exposure to residual, and where residual sits against appetite.

Risk heat map: inherent vs residual
Likelihood × impact; bubble area = exposure. Toggle inherent / residual.
Signature
5×5 matrix · click a bubble to cross-filter risk level
Open risk over time
Monthly open risks, stacked by residual level
Stacked area · Low / Medium / High / Critical
Risk by category
Count & exposure, sorted
Sorted bars · click to cross-filter category
From inherent to residual risk
Mitigation contributed by each control type
Waterfall · exposure $ · running connectors
Residual risk vs appetite
Per category, against the appetite threshold
Bullet bars · exposure $ vs appetite marker
02 · Bowtie & controls

How a top risk is actually controlled

The bowtie for a chosen top risk — threats, preventive barriers, the top event, mitigating barriers and consequences — plus how effective controls are by type and framework, whether risks are truly covered, and the overall control status.

Bowtie: how a top risk is controlled
Threats → preventive barriers → top event → mitigating barriers → consequences
Signature
Hand-rolled bowtie · barriers coloured by control effectiveness · pick a risk in-panel
Control effectiveness
Mean effectiveness by control type × framework
Heatmap · value-in-cell · sequential scale
Are risks actually covered?
Risks by effective / partial / uncovered control
Stacked bars · per risk category
Control status
Share by status; centre = effectiveness %
Donut (≤4) · centre KPI
03 · Compliance frameworks

Are we compliant against our frameworks?

Posture across ISO 27001, SOC 2, NIST CSF and GDPR — the radial composition of every domain by status, framework-level implementation, the improving trend, where the gaps cluster, and NIST CSF maturity against target.

Compliance by framework
Each framework's domains, coloured by status; inner ring = overall %
Signature
Radial / sunburst · framework → domain → status
Framework implementation
Implemented / partial / gap, sorted by score
100% stacked bars · direct-labelled %
Compliance is improving
Monthly weighted compliance score, per framework
Multi-line · direct-labelled endpoints
Where the gaps are
Framework × domain; gaps highlighted
Heatmap · status by domain
NIST CSF maturity
Current maturity vs target, per function
Radar · Govern / Identify / Protect / Detect / Respond / Recover
04 · Findings & treatment

What's open, and is remediation keeping pace?

The findings register with aging and severity, how findings flow in by severity over time, the treatment pipeline from identified to complete, whether open treatments are burning down to plan, and who is carrying overdue work.

Findings register
Source, severity, framework, owner, age and status — sortable; overdue tinted
First-class table · click a row to cross-filter
Findings by severity
Monthly findings opened, stacked by severity
Stacked bars over time · severity 1–5
Treatment pipeline
Identified → planned → in-progress → complete
Funnel · counts + conversion
Open treatments burndown
Open treatment count vs an ideal burndown
Line vs ideal · open actions/week
Overdue treatments by owner
Overdue remediation count, sorted
Sorted bars · click to cross-filter owner
05 · Exposure

Where the dollars at risk are

Residual likelihood against impact with the top exposures named, exposure by business unit and category, the largest individual risks, the rhythm of control testing, and the programme's vitals as small multiples.

Likelihood vs impact
Residual L × I; bubble area = exposure; quadrants labelled
Scatter + quadrant lines · top exposures named
Exposure by business unit
Exposure $ by BU, then category, sized to share
Treemap · exposure $
Top risks by exposure
Title, category, L × I, exposure, treatment, owner
First-class table · top 12 by residual exposure · trend spark
Control testing cadence
Controls tested per week across the window
Calendar heatmap · tests/day · gaps visible
GRC vitals
Small-multiple trends across the programme
Small-multiple sparklines